Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Sept 11, 2007 21:24:35 GMT -5
By sheepal I mean all you BF believers who are ready to hop on any BF train that pulls into the station. Just because you believe that BF exists, hope that it exists, prays that it exists does not mean that it exists. You should be just as skeptical of all these experts as I am because when they are exposed they make you look foolish also. Save your chest pounding until someone comes up with a body and not 2 seconds of shaky out of focus video. Ummmmm.....I think that based on my posts I have made it pretty clear that I am skeptical of any footage that is available. I don't feel as though I have hopped on any train, but I do support the efforts made by others to go out and find proof. I may be biased of how I communicate my opinions so please do let me know if I come across as believing any BF BS that comes along. You see... This is my problem... I don't think there are BF Experts, because they have yet to prove that there is anything to be an expert about. Todd and the rest can research all they want, but until they got the proof they aren't experts. Why jump on one little phrase when the point that I was trying to communicate completely agrees with your opinion? You make it sound as if we are of differing opinions when in reality, we are not. As I have said many times we have no proof and until we do the whole subject of BF is bunk.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Sept 12, 2007 4:44:27 GMT -5
Paul-I was not meaning you. I have always enjoyed your opinion and postings. I was talking of others who are so desperate to believe in this BF fantasy that they will grasp onto the slightest evidence and hold it up as proof that the creature exists.
|
|
|
Post by malyss on Sept 12, 2007 21:50:15 GMT -5
This line of dialogue is rapidly becoming a yawn fest. I'm am bored to tears with it all. Let me know when anyone has anything new, relevant or interesting to offer.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Sept 14, 2007 14:10:31 GMT -5
Kova-I don't think you were banned for disagreeing. You probably said something rude/libelist. I know that I was banned twice and deserved it both times. Ken is a decent person even though we differ on BF. Just tame your remarks and you can remain on the board. I think that is all they are asking-Darren
|
|
|
Post by gbone34 on Sept 16, 2007 5:47:15 GMT -5
never be conclusivly solved 60's special effects don't play into it when you consider the distance, the angle, duration of film, focus, camera movement, lighting, etc. either a good or bad costume or the real thing looks equally uncertain in this situation Conveniantly?? Maybe, but think if you stumbled upon BF! Horses scared and so-on. walking in high mountain creek beds isnt always a smooth go of it either, especially in stress situations. But then again...?
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Sept 18, 2007 17:55:03 GMT -5
rude/libelist??? you mean asking for the proof or truth No he means being rude, nobody has a problem with someone asking for proof as there is none. Anyone reading your posts can see that many were rude and full of attitude. If you really think that you are being unfairly picked on and unfairly banned, well then I think that you are in a state of denial and you need to step back and reread what you have posted here. Just being honest here, not trying to start a fight but you need to be a little more realistic and honest with yourself.
|
|
|
Post by kova on Sept 24, 2007 22:44:33 GMT -5
lol... I need to be more realistic and honest??? dude, I am reality and the honesty shouldn't have to start with me, but the people who run this website and make the claims they make.
I have always been down with people saying they say something strange and were creeeped out be it. Seeing bigfoot and scared nutsless. But when people start to act like the #1 authority on something with no proof, I just can't stand buy and not voice my opinion.
I would have even been more interested in this case if todd had gone at it with some innocence and amateurish approach. But they have taken a road that makes them look foolish.
they could be celebrities... (and you may say that is not what they want) i say BS. don't go on all the local papers, and new braodcasts then. Just show your video 3. if it is real you will have network news station pick up your cause... and isn't that all they want?? a national/international audience...
I swear if I see that video 3 and believe 100% that they caught a video on film.... I will fight for todd's cause right beside him.... even if I don't really think it will mater.
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Sept 25, 2007 9:39:30 GMT -5
Kova, I think that you missed my point. There's nothing wrong with your opinion, the only thing in question has been how you presented it.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Sept 25, 2007 15:29:31 GMT -5
As the resident skeptic with 2 bannings under my belt I would have to agree with Paul. Sometimes you come across a little strong. E-mail is a weird thing. Something said in person comes across 10 times stronger in e-mail. Just soften it up a little like I have.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptor on Oct 7, 2007 12:19:12 GMT -5
Where is our expert right now? How does he earn his living? Where is the new documentary? Has he ever tried for a movie or book deal? So many questions, so little response.
|
|