|
Post by psidiver on Nov 17, 2007 21:46:20 GMT -5
I believe if Sylvanic is surrounded by mountains and is not subterranean it should be easy to hypothesize on gps and topo where some candidate spots are. It could very easily be a "bowl" or cut-off range of mountains. I research in a similar protected area which could be described the same way, the advantage being the strategic nature of sight, sound and protection from the elements, also possibly caves, crevices, etc. Also easier to use communal hunting strategies in an enclosed bowl if there is plenty of water like the videos suggest through the audio track. My two loonies worth. Sterling S.
|
|
|
Post by Guy Watkins on Feb 25, 2012 19:35:12 GMT -5
Kinda resurrecting a dead thread here but hey, I'm a solid believer and all I can say to you naysayers is something that has previously been said, it's hard to get clear un-blurry video evidence of a dangerous and well hidden creature. Yet he did, he came back with stills and videos of it's f**king face. CLOSE UP. and of both genders. All you skeptics say your bit as normal, but ask yourself isn't any skeptic going to question a clear face shot of bigfoot? no one else can provide that. And again try looking at this as not "bigfoot" this childish sounding nickname we have given to this creature create a story mythos to the beast itself, try thinking of it as a more evolved gorilla. Now think about trying to find a domicile and walk right f**king into it. Yes thats right shut up and go back to being keyboard warriors, because your certainly not an outdoors man. Todd's evidence of bigfoot is profound. One can only wonder how much of their turd he has racked up over the years searching!
|
|