|
Post by darrenbonk on Aug 13, 2007 16:24:52 GMT -5
Could everyone watch Video 2 and comment on it. Todd says that this was captured accidentally however when you watch the video it pans just past the "creature" then pans back to a point where the "creature" is directly in the centre of the screen and in focus. By coincidence it has its back to the camera. And what happens the moment when the "creature" is in the centre of the screen? It (in)conviently ducks down. Then the camera pans away. As a private investigator specializing in surveillance for the past 22 years I find it hard to believe that this sequence of events was an accident. Personally, it appears staged.
|
|
|
Post by buddharat on Aug 13, 2007 17:24:40 GMT -5
If it's not staged then it's some of the luckiest footage anyone has ever got. I see exactly what you mean about the camera coming back.
Is there anything more Todd can tell about the situation other then that he accidently caught it?
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Aug 13, 2007 17:28:22 GMT -5
Sometimes it kind of looks like a guy in a suit and sometimes it looks like a bear. No matter what it is, it is too out of focus to determine one way or the other. I would deem it yet another "Squatch-Blob" to coin a term that I read somewhere.
For someone "wanting" to see a BF, this could work for them I guess. I have read some BF reports where the person obviously "willed" a BF encounter, LOL!
On the other hand if I was the guy behind the camera experiencing the moment I would feel much more confident in what it was that I captured on film. Even though the footage is pretty much worthless as far as "proof" to people who were not there.
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Aug 13, 2007 17:35:19 GMT -5
Is there anything more Todd can tell about the situation other then that he accidently caught it? Does this help? The camera issue: Having studied the raw footage ad nausea I will relate the point and issue. The footage was slightly longer than presented ( it has mostly been presented at a 0:27 - 0:30 second running time verses the 1:52 seconds the clip actually is). The camera at that time was being moved and caught, from what I originally observed by complete accident, the large male in the video on the ridge edge. They were moving the camera to train on a spot behind where they originally had been set up and caught the image mid-move. ( This camera move was mainly due to, as related to me later, that Todd and the others believed they heard a sound behind them but later figured it was a reverberation off the surrounding walls of rock. Being a videographer by profession I can attest that the movement was a sudden and unplanned pan due to the amount of time it takes the camera to focus on the location of the male in the frame.) The large male dropped into a squat and the camera veers off for a few seconds and there is vocal commotion, which is all but indistinguishable. ( This potion of the video has been cut from every broadcast, save the first versions, due to time and that you really see nothing save mountainside.) There is a scattered collection of almost unwatchable footage that follows, a mistaken record when they were moving which is a nauseating blur of rocky earth and voices ( how many videos like THAT have been posted around the world, like we need another of THOSE) and then a short examination of the area which occurred shortly thereafter where no sign of the male is seen, no footprints or hair. What WAS in that footage was a key element of Todd’s “superficial signs” which, if made public, would defeat the purpose of preventing a measure of tracking ability for would be hunters which leads me to…. or this: And to the next post. A. I do not think the animal would have stood up again. B. We immediately moved up on that animal because we though we had him trapped. He had to either rock climb and jump a waterfall (Which is to the right in the video) or come right past us(To the left). We though he had to come right past us obviously. But it did the impossible and rock climbed and jumped. No other animal in the world could have done that.
|
|
|
Post by buddharat on Aug 13, 2007 17:50:29 GMT -5
Excellent, thank you Paul.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Aug 13, 2007 20:40:07 GMT -5
I find it laughable that Kenneth Barr says its a large "male" in the video. How can anyone make that claim. Its obvious from my earlier posting that this video, like so many others, has been faked. Todd says the footage was caught by accident although the camera is extremely shaky until the "creature" was right in the centre of the frame. Of course the "creatures" back was to the camera and the "creature" just happens to duck at that exact time. And then what happens! The camera veers away. All of this in low light conditions of course. What a series of coincidences!!!!! Lets face it people. We have been had!!!
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Aug 13, 2007 21:38:47 GMT -5
I find it laughable that Kenneth Barr says its a large "male" in the video. How can anyone make that claim. Its obvious from my earlier posting that this video, like so many others, has been faked. Todd says the footage was caught by accident although the camera is extremely shaky until the "creature" was right in the centre of the frame. Of course the "creatures" back was to the camera and the "creature" just happens to duck at that exact time. And then what happens! The camera veers away. All of this in low light conditions of course. What a series of coincidences!!!!! Lets face it people. We have been had!!! Could be.... Since the videos he currently has offer no proof, I wasn't banking on them. What intrigued me was his claim to be able to go back and find them again. It is this possible next set of videos that have my curiosity piqued. Although based on some recent posts my confidence in him being able to live up to his claims has been lowered....
|
|