Post by taffy341 on Sept 5, 2007 1:57:52 GMT -5
Has Todd & Ken secured any additional groups to sign the petition?
I was wondering if in outskirt communities that know of these Bigfoots/Forest Peoples, if the people would be inclined to sign petitions in support of protecting Bigfoot.
How would the 'Petition to Protect Bigfoot' benefit communities to be in support of protection. Is there something environmentally or commercially that would be a benefit if the Bigfoot in the area was protected? Would the petition assist in helping to keep the Bigfoot in the outskirt wild areas away from the areas that humans habitat?
What I mean is would the people in certain outskirt areas prefer that Bigfoot stay away in its' own wild areas; such that a petition to protect Bigfoot (and maybe humans also) may assist in insuring that the Bigfoot habitats remain isolated from humans.
Of course large corporations such as logging and other industries would find this financially disruptive and do everything within their powers to stop any interference with the corporate businesses & industries invading the forest habitats for profits. Corporations (logging, etc.) are notorious for infiltrating environmental and other groups that affect their profits, for the sole disruptive purpose of undermining by doubt, conflict and skepticism.
What does everyone out there think about the various corporations' lobbying and propaganda to stop the 'petition protection of Bigfoot' and it's habitats?
I was wondering if in outskirt communities that know of these Bigfoots/Forest Peoples, if the people would be inclined to sign petitions in support of protecting Bigfoot.
How would the 'Petition to Protect Bigfoot' benefit communities to be in support of protection. Is there something environmentally or commercially that would be a benefit if the Bigfoot in the area was protected? Would the petition assist in helping to keep the Bigfoot in the outskirt wild areas away from the areas that humans habitat?
What I mean is would the people in certain outskirt areas prefer that Bigfoot stay away in its' own wild areas; such that a petition to protect Bigfoot (and maybe humans also) may assist in insuring that the Bigfoot habitats remain isolated from humans.
Of course large corporations such as logging and other industries would find this financially disruptive and do everything within their powers to stop any interference with the corporate businesses & industries invading the forest habitats for profits. Corporations (logging, etc.) are notorious for infiltrating environmental and other groups that affect their profits, for the sole disruptive purpose of undermining by doubt, conflict and skepticism.
What does everyone out there think about the various corporations' lobbying and propaganda to stop the 'petition protection of Bigfoot' and it's habitats?
