|
Post by The Truth on Nov 3, 2007 22:42:20 GMT -5
Quite the perspective, Stinkhornjake. Sounds like a foolproof, watertight strategy to lure people on forever without ever showing any evidence! Kind of a Perpetual Motion Bigfoot Machine..... Also, something about your writing style reminds me of one Todd Standing..... know the guy?
|
|
|
Post by The Truth on Nov 3, 2007 22:54:59 GMT -5
And , yes, Todd Standing has an obligation to put up or shut up as HE IS THE ONE THAT STARTED THIS SYLVANIC THING. He has called himself the foremost bigfoot expert in the world and claims to have, "diffinitive proof", but can't reveal it because if he does he says he's afraid someone will kill it! Now, he says, the only way to stop someone from killing it is to pass a law in the house of commons prohibiting sasquatch murder. But the catch 22 is that no one will vote to preserve something that has no proof of existence! UNBELIEVABLE! I think my head is going to explode!!!
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 4, 2007 8:23:39 GMT -5
Well today is the big day the video is suppose to some out. I won't be holding by breath. Chalk up another disappointment.
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 5, 2007 10:43:36 GMT -5
You can't really be disappointed can you? Like I posted previously, a guest signs in and says that he spoke with Todd who stated that there was a new video. ANYBODY on the planet could sign in and make that claim. There was never any reason to think that there had been any new video footage captured. If Todd or Ken post that there's new video or if they post something on the main page, then I would believe that there was something coming out.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 5, 2007 16:10:32 GMT -5
I personally think that Todd became involved in something that quickly got out of control. He became convinced that BF is a real creature and started this PR ball rolling down the hill. The ball rolled faster and faster and now he cannot stop it. Unfortunetly he eventually has to offer real proof or else he will be quickly be considered a fraud like so many others. Its like when the Lindberg baby was kidnapped. Many people, including Capone, came forward saying that they could and would recover the infant. The thing is......you can make all the claims you want, talk is cheap, eventually you have to produce. Todd has failed to do this.
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 5, 2007 17:50:59 GMT -5
That's true, talk is cheap.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 5, 2007 18:48:45 GMT -5
Funny how we have had no word on this forum from Todd since August but someone logged onto his Myspace account on Nov 3/07.
|
|
|
Post by teaberryeagle on Nov 10, 2007 20:06:52 GMT -5
Hey Guys! Just came aboard, but I think I have a revelation for you....I know you have seen the "Jacob's Beast" photos....well, then, you saw a "Bigfoot"........I was analyzing his three photos and I, Harry W. McCormack, discovered what was completely overlooked by everyone.....with all the concentration on whether they were seeing a "Bigfoot" and that it was a skinny bear, I'm sure you saw all the advertisements.....they completely overlooked the "BABY"/"JUVENILE" THAT was lying, snuggled in a fur lined basket or cradle, as I reported the finding..........YOUR FIRST LOOK INTO THE FACE OF A "BIGFOOT".....check it out........in the third photo, the baby is still in the furlined basket, near the lower border of the photo, and the adult, a female of course, is nursing a second baby. I think they are trying to anallyze the photos again since they will be looking for my new discovery.....and, I have maintained that the creature is in the form of a "Pig", cloven hoofs and the hoof/hands are adaptable for this use......they wear the furlined outfits when there is a possibility of being seen.........I have now made a second world shattering discovery about a "Bigfoot" that I will share later. Don't really know the liability for reporting these things about other folk's photos.......hope it's alright, because the next one is a dilly.......someone might inform me, if you know......thanks
|
|
|
Post by darenbonk on Nov 10, 2007 23:09:22 GMT -5
teaberryeagle you are nuts you fool
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 11, 2007 10:02:21 GMT -5
Hey darenbonk have you seen the Jacobs photos? You are an outdoorsman, what's your take on them?
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 11, 2007 14:36:11 GMT -5
Where can I view them Paul?
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 11, 2007 15:25:58 GMT -5
I don't know that I can link to them per the site policy.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 11, 2007 21:23:54 GMT -5
The pics are in my opinion inconclusive. Well, except the bear cub. The supposed juvenile Bigfoot just may be a bear however the pic is too poor to tell. Here is the big question.........where's Todd?
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 11, 2007 21:41:32 GMT -5
At least it's something new to look at though. Personally I'm thinking bear based on how the back flexes, short feet, etc.
I have no idea where Todd or Ken are....
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 12, 2007 9:41:00 GMT -5
I agree with you. Thats the big question. Where is Todd. Like I said it is weird that someone logged into his myspace last week but we have not heard from him on this forum. He said his work is scientifically repeatable. I still think its one huge con job.
|
|