|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 12, 2007 15:07:51 GMT -5
He initially called Video 2 and 3 "definitive" which means conclusive and final then backtracks and says that Video 2 could be a man in a suit and that more proof is needed. Well which is it? I hate when he uses words like"tremendous success" and "scientifically repeatable". Don't talk the talk if you can't walk the walk. And you know what ticks me off about Video 2? Its fake. How can a mammal, with its back to the camera, be aware enough to actually duck the moment the camera centres on it. It cannot see the people because its back is to them. This thing has scam written all over it. I cannot believe how much time I have wasted.
|
|
|
Post by halo3gamer on Nov 13, 2007 1:02:49 GMT -5
I think he has some consideral amount of pressure on him, from......Now thats the big question. To go to the extent that he has and then just stop, either he has something really big that he's about to unveil or somebody really big is shutting him down.
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 13, 2007 5:34:02 GMT -5
Or there may be a third and most likely explaination.........Big Foot does not exist and this is a huge hoax.
|
|
|
Post by omah lover on Nov 13, 2007 14:12:31 GMT -5
Darrenbonk...if your so sick of wasting time and all the time youve invested why are you on here everyday??Stop wasting your time and stay away from the site. Occams razor..simplist solution is the right one......stop pregnant doging about the site,the evidence,the lack of evidence and all the fake people in suits. Want to get to the bottom of the bigfoot mystery??Get off your ass and go out and find out the truth instead of sitting behind your computer screen waiting for one to be downloaded in your lap. I just got back from 4 nights at Skookum Meadow in the snow...what did you do this weekend??
|
|
|
Post by The Truth on Nov 14, 2007 11:23:47 GMT -5
There has been white men with guns on the north American continent since 1492, that's over half a milenium, more than enough time to find a nine foot tall, 800 lb. creature of any kind. No need to get out in the field and search for one. Think of this: even with all of bigfoot's psychic ability, habit of neatly burying it's dead, and day watcher sentry system, pure statistical chance tells us we should have at least found one bone by now. Heck, they're finding remains from hundreds of thousands of years ago, shouldn't we be able to find one living one, with bigfoot experts putting their population in the thousands to tens of thousands?
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 14, 2007 17:41:18 GMT -5
Ohma Lover-Is Todd the real deal or a hoaxer?
|
|
|
Post by Luna on Nov 19, 2007 20:20:35 GMT -5
There has been white men with guns on the north American continent since 1492, that's over half a milenium, more than enough time to find a nine foot tall, 800 lb. creature of any kind. No need to get out in the field and search for one. Think of this: even with all of bigfoot's psychic ability, habit of neatly burying it's dead, and day watcher sentry system, pure statistical chance tells us we should have at least found one bone by now. Heck, they're finding remains from hundreds of thousands of years ago, shouldn't we be able to find one living one, with bigfoot experts putting their population in the thousands to tens of thousands? If they had would you believe it?
|
|
|
Post by The Truth on Nov 19, 2007 23:14:28 GMT -5
If they had it would I believe it? Why wouldn't I? Why wouldn't anyone? They found the lowland gorillas about a hundred years ago, and I believe that. Why? Because there are photos, remains, videos, and living specimens, all documented by science and civilization. Give me the same and yes, I and everyone else on the planet will believe it.
The hard, cold fact is that there has been HUNDREDS of years to come up with real proof and it still hasn't happened. The bigfoot con men say, "We've almost got it.", or, "Just one more week." It's always been , "one more week'. I've been waiting almost 41 years since the Roger Patterson film came out an NOTHING (unless you want to count blurry videos and photos of the thing behind a tree branch or a bush). It's just doesn't exist or we would have found it by now.....
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 20, 2007 11:45:25 GMT -5
The hard, cold fact is that there has been HUNDREDS of years to come up with real proof and it still hasn't happened. The bigfoot con men say, "We've almost got it.", or, "Just one more week." It's always been , "one more week'. I've been waiting almost 41 years since the Roger Patterson film came out an NOTHING (unless you want to count blurry videos and photos of the thing behind a tree branch or a bush). It's just doesn't exist or we would have found it by now..... That's definitely the most likely explanation....unless you are one of those wierdos that have seen the ugly beast in person. I suppose that could be blamed on temporary insanity, hallucinations or something like that I guess.
|
|
|
Post by halo3gamer on Nov 20, 2007 19:00:47 GMT -5
You know the worlds a funny place, you have people who genuinely have to have some proof to believe. Then you have people who believe just by hearing, and then you have the people who believe anything is possible. I try not to put myself in any one of these groups, & if there is more groups those groups either. But, eventually I come to a reality whether i like it or not I am. I'm in a group, I'm not a coward I'll be the first to tell you how I feel & what I believe. I believe that if Bigfoot wasn't real you wouldn't have as many eyewitnesses as we have, & you wouldn't have the natives accounts & drawings from around the world. So do I believe there is a Bigfoot or a North American ape? Absolutely, Is there some proof of evidence? Absolutely. To say it is not real cause we haven't found it is premature & immature.
|
|
|
Post by The Truth on Nov 20, 2007 20:46:02 GMT -5
I TOTALLY and respectfully disagree. The absense of the scientific method to establish truth in the physical world would put our intellect back in the middle ages, where legends, superstitions, and ignorance ran amok. If that were true then my word would be as good as yours whether you or I liked it or not. There has to be an objective system of rules to establish reality in the physical sense, or else let the witch burnings begin....
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 21, 2007 10:30:14 GMT -5
Interesting perspectives...Ya it's pretty much official that BF does not exist. Do I think that BF exists? Have I stared the ugly beast in the face? I can't provide proof, so it really doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Post by The Truth on Nov 21, 2007 11:55:51 GMT -5
It matters to you, which is fine. But if you want to convince someone else ,more than your word is needed. Established proof would get everyone on board.
Does this mean that there's no adventure or romance left in the world? Hardly, just look at the wonderful earth around us with more amazing things than one can comprehend. Then look up, absolutley mind boggling.
Do I think there's any animal species to be discovered? The ocean is a big place, along with certain unexplord areas of south east asia, Africa and Siberia. But uber populated and exploited North America hosting an 8 foot tall 800 lb. ape? I don't think so...
|
|
|
Post by darrenbonk on Nov 21, 2007 14:24:18 GMT -5
I have said it before and I will say it again..........why is Todd spending copious amounts of time talking to the press, running websites, doing speaking engagements etc when he actually has not proved that BF actually exists? If I knew in my heart of hearts that the creature exists I would spend every waking moment finding absolute proof. The scientific world would be rocked. But Todd is not doing that. He is spending his time trying to convince us the creature exist via the media. Who cares? My personal belief is that Todd became convinced that the creature existed..........started the ball rolling down the hill.......and now he cannot stop it. He's in a corner now.
And there is always the question of integrity. On his my space site under schooling he claims to have some college courses. In the National Post he claims to have taken some Chemistry courses in University. On this very web site he claims that he is a biologist/scientist. Which is it?
And that video 2 still bugs me. Todd claims it was captured accidental. Why does the creature (who has its back to the camera) suddenly crouch down the moment the camera is focused on it. How did it know it was detected if its back was to the camera?
I think Todd is desperate for attention. Remember how angry he was when he was not given enough radio time on "Coast to Coast".
One day I hope he comes clean and admits that we have been scammed.
|
|
Paul
Full Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by Paul on Nov 21, 2007 14:27:31 GMT -5
Mr The Truth,
That's cool....Ya my search for BF is pretty much limited to the internet. When I get out into the woods, the last thing on my mind is trying to find one. I do however avoid areas where in the past strange things have happened and I also relocate myself or even camp if strange things occur.
For me I just like to enjoy the outdoors and I'm not really interested in finding "undiscovered" animals. I do however like to know about the plants, animals, etc that are out there with me. So in the future if someone were to find something or capture some video or photos I would be interested. But for all of the reasons that you mentioned it sure seems unlikely huh? I guess only time will tell....
|
|